Research published by NMCSN-affiliated investigators — held to the same verification standard as everything else on this page.
NMCSN faculty on national and international programs. Every listing links to the official conference program.
Recent papers that change how we understand or deliver shock care. Every title links to its verified PubMed record; every statistic comes from the published abstract or full text.
Every randomized trial that shaped shock care, 1999 → 2025 — what it asked, what it found, what it changed at the bedside. Neutral trials matter as much as wins: knowing what doesn't work is half of shock care.
What are you seeing in your practice? React to the feed, push back on a take, or share how a paper changed your approach.
Most clinicians don't have time to scan the shock literature weekly — and many don't have access to AI tools that can. So we run the scan and publish it here, the way we'd want to browse it ourselves.
Every month, AI sweeps PubMed and the major cardiovascular journals for new cardiogenic shock and MCS literature and drafts candidate summaries.
Nothing is published from AI memory. Each card's citation is checked against the live PubMed record, and every displayed number is traced to the published abstract or full text. Preprints are flagged.
The NMCSN team sets the inclusion lens, reviews takes, and curates the landmark library. Summaries labeled "AI summary" are machine-drafted and verification-gated; physician-reviewed takes are marked.
